Shepherd-Banigan, Megan, et al. “Experiences of VA Vocational and Education Training and Assistance Services: Facilitators and Barriers Reported by Veterans with Disabilities.” Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, vol. 44, no. 2, June 2021, pp. 148–56. PubMed, https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000437...

Vest, Joshua R., et al. “Getting from Here to There: Health IT Needs for Population Health.” The American Journal of Managed Care, vol. 22, no. 12, Dec. 2016, pp. 827–29. Details Resource: Article Related: Grantee Research Project

Mays, Glen P., et al. “Preventable Death Rates Fell Where Communities Expanded Population Health Activities Through Multisector Networks.” Health Affairs (Project Hope), vol. 35, no. 11, Nov. 2016, pp. 2005–13, https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0848. Details Resource: Article Nalsys Related...

Hogg, Rachel A., et al. “Hospital Contributions to the Delivery of Public Health Activities in US Metropolitan Areas: National and Longitudinal Trends.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 105, no. 8, Aug. 2015, pp. 1646–52, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302563. Details Resource: Article...

Population and individual health are significantly influenced by social determinants that range from individuals’ knowledge and behaviors to community-level characteristics, resources, and conditions. The expertise and infrastructure to address these multiple and diverse challenges are divided among...

van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline M., et al. “Examining Alignment of Community Health Teams’ Preferences for Health, Equity, and Spending with State All-Payer Waiver Priorities: A Discrete Choice Experiment.” Health Services Research, vol. 59, no. S1, 2024, p. e14257, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773...

The Collaborating Research Center at Indiana University, brings together experts from a health system, a public health agency, social and community services, an informatics leader, and a school of public health, to address the Systems for Action Research Agenda Priority Area #1; investigating the...

Logic models and theories of change can be helpful brainstorming and planning tools for program developers and evaluators, as well as providing a convenient way to describe the structure and benefits of the program to potential funders. This guide offers brief descriptions of webinars, trainings...

Members of the National Advisory Committee advise on program strategies and future direction, contributing to the System for Action program’s success in generating new evidence to connect the nation’s fragmented medical, social and public health systems.